So, new syntax uses slightly (very slightly!) more memory but is faster.
I guess it’s a winner. ![]()
So, new syntax uses slightly (very slightly!) more memory but is faster.
I guess it’s a winner. ![]()
i think consuming an extra ~0.0792 bytes per event call is an acceptable tradeoff ![]()
If an exception is thrown, this could be remedied easily and quickly during development and testing.
But I really don’t know if all raised events need to be handled.